Ming Dynasty: Teaching The Prince Dragon-Slaying Skills At The Beginning

Chapter 333: Social Contradictions Concealed Under Rapid Economic Growth [Please Subscribe, Please S

“When a country’s development moves from rapid growth to a stage of saturation, slowdown, and stagnation, it means that the growth of social resources begins to slow down or even stops.

“At this time, the resources in society will change from the seemingly ever-growing ‘unlimited’ to ‘limited’. "

"When the 'resources' in society become limited, the upward channel for class mobility will naturally begin to narrow inward. This can also be said to be a universal law of social class change."

"When the upward channels for class mobility begin to narrow, the competition among people from all walks of life around the upward mobility channels will begin to become fierce. As a result, conflicts in society will begin to increase and be stimulated."

"Even some extremely subtle contradictions may become shocking after being exaggerated and spread intentionally or unintentionally."

Yan Changqing looked at Zhu Yuanzhang below, as well as the princes Zhu Biao, Zhu Xi, Zhu Fan, Zhu Di and other princes, and said calmly.

The so-called "resources" in society, in the words of Yan Changqing in his previous life, are actually the growth of economic GDP.

When a country's economic GDP is in a stage of rapid growth, there are very few social conflicts in the country.

In other words, these social contradictions have been buried by the rapid growth of economic GDP.

To give a simple and one-sided example, for example, you were accidentally hit by someone else on the road, but you were not injured. Not to mention going to the hospital, you didn't even need to put on a band-aid.

Of course, if you are hit, you are hit. It is possible to pursue, settle, and compensate.

It's just that the process of investigating, determining liability, and making compensation will take at least three to five days, and at most it may even take one or two months.

And because of this incident, during the period of investigation, liability determination, and compensation, I may not be able to work normally, and I will not be able to guarantee my stable work income during this period.

And even if you are finally investigated, held responsible, and compensated, the compensation you receive may not be as much as the money you earn from a day's work!!!

So at this time, are you giving up the stable working income for the next three or five days, or even one or two months, for the compensation that may only be equivalent to one day's working income?!!

Or for the next three or five days, or even one or two months of stable work income, just tell the other party that it’s okay and end the matter?!

Normally, most people will choose the latter.

Because it’s not worth choosing the former, it’s that simple!

Or give a simpler and cruder example:

For example, you can make millions every minute, and then you are suddenly punched on the road for no reason.

As for the person who hit you, based on the severity of your injuries, the maximum compensation limit is only one million!

And from the moment you ask him to compensate you, to the moment he is willing to compensate you, and finally transfers 1 million to you, it will take at least three minutes of your time to be wasted!!!

In other words, if you pester him to compensate one million, you will earn three million less!!!

At this time, would you ask him to compensate one million, or would you just pretend that there was no such thing and continue to earn the three million?!!

Normally, most people will choose the latter.

Because choosing the former is still not worth it!

For example, being hit or beaten by someone, aren't these social conflicts?

It must be a social conflict!!!

However, these social contradictions become relatively unworthy of mention when faced with an environment of rapid national or personal economic growth and development.

When these social contradictions are "not worth mentioning", then the scene presented in society is naturally one of prosperity and harmonious development.

This is the so-called rapid economic growth covering up social contradictions!!!

But when economic development changes from high-speed growth to medium-high-speed growth, medium-speed growth, low-speed growth, or even stops growing.

It turns out that those social contradictions that are “not worth mentioning” will not be covered up, and will be exposed one after another, and even break out!

It's still the same example of being accidentally hit just now, except that you went from having a job and a high income to an unemployed person with no income.

Will you give up asking for compensation from the other party at this time?!!

of course not!!!

When most people were knocked down, they had already taken out their mobile phones, opened the car's home, and started to look at which new car they were going to buy.

Similarly, when I was punched for no reason, I used to be worth a million dollars a minute, but now I don't even know if I am worth a hundred dollars a day.

Will you give up asking for compensation from the other party at this time?!!

Normally, most people would have fallen down when they were punched. Then they would take out their mobile phones and start looking at which properties were on sale nearby, and then prepare to buy them in full.

When social conflicts like this frequently break out, the original prosperous and harmoniously developing social state will gradually begin to turn into a social state filled with hostility.

Someone like Yan Changqing in his previous life attributed such a violent social state to the Internet.

It is said that the Internet has expanded people's information exposure, allowing people to be exposed to a lot of bad and negative information across the country and even the world in a short period of time, which gives people the illusion that society as a whole is in a negative state.

In the end, under the influence of these bad negative information and his own illusions, he also became one of the people who generated bad negative information!

To put it simply, it means all the bad things that happened on the land of 9.6 million square kilometers, or even all the bad things that happened on the land of 149 million square kilometers.

All are done remotely through the Internet, making people feel as if these groups are happening around them.

This makes people feel angry, and ultimately leads to the spread of social violence.

However, this statement is not correct. (is the money good)

Because the Internet has enlarged people's information exposure, allowing people to be exposed to a large number of bad and negative information across the country and even the world in a short period of time, it is also exposed to the country and even the world in a short period of time. A wide range of positive messages!

The impact of these bad negative information or positive information on people is only superficial and temporary.

The fundamental reasons that really influence and determine the social atmosphere and state are never:

Will the economy continue to grow at a rapid pace?!!

Are the various resources in society continuing to increase?

Whether the upward channel for class mobility is still loose, etc.!!!

PS1: New books are on the shelves, and we are in urgent need of all the handsome guys, beauties, and big guys to order and customize them! I wish all the big guys who have full orders and customized books to get rich overnight, good health, and all the best.

Good luck! Thank you all! I kneel down to all the bosses!